Skip to main content
Edit Page - Admin Only Style Guide - Admin Only Control Panel - Admin Only
IMS-MMR-October-Employee-Spotlight_2510_Banner

Beyond the Bio: A Spotlight on Justin Anderson

04.11.25

|

Justin Anderson, PhD, brings a blend of academic rigor, industry insight, and courtroom experience to his role as Managing Director of Litigation Surveys and Consumer Science at IMS Legal Strategies. With a doctorate in marketing and a background that spans government agencies, private litigation, and university classrooms, Justin leads our expert research team with precision and purpose. His work helps IMS clients substantiate advertising claims, assess consumer perception, and navigate complex intellectual property disputes.

Read on to discover Dr. Anderson’s journey from military meteorologist to litigation survey expert and learn how his training, background, and passion for excellence continue to shape IMS’s strategic client solutions.


Q: Early in your career, you served as an officer in the US Air Force. That must have been very different from being a survey expert.

A: Actually, there are many parallels. First, because my undergraduate degree is in meteorology, I was assigned as a weather officer. My role was to examine weather data and analyze it to provide an opinion regarding how weather conditions would impact flight operations. Additionally, I provided my expert scientific opinions to the people who needed to rely on my expertise: the mission commander and the pilots flying a particular mission. Those correspond very closely to my role as a survey expert, in which I examine survey data and analyze it to provide an opinion about how consumer perceptions may affect litigation. I provide my expert scientific opinions to the people who need to rely on my survey expertise, including the judge and the jury deciding a particular legal issue.

Furthermore, part of my role as a weather officer was to provide scientific leadership for the weather observers and forecasters who worked with me to support our aircrews. As Managing Director of Litigation Surveys and Consumer Science at IMS Legal Strategies, I provide scientific leadership for the research staff who work with me and our other testifying experts to support our clients. So, while it may not be immediately obvious to a casual observer, there is a lot of similarity.

Q: So, do you think your training as a meteorologist helped you to become a survey expert?

A: Like my current work, my meteorology studies were scientific, analytical, and data-driven. But my credentials as a survey expert come from my later studies and experiences. After I left the Air Force, I earned an MBA with a concentration in marketing from the University of Illinois. I had a summer internship in marketing research and took a full-time position in advertising research after I completed my MBA.

I later completed a PhD in Marketing at the University of Southern California. Those studies focused very deeply on marketing, consumer psychology, and related topics, while also including a comprehensive study of survey research methods, experimental design, questionnaire writing, statistical analysis, and other methodological topics. The combination of my master’s and doctoral studies in survey research, as well as approximately 25 years of conducting survey research in academia and in commercial practice, provides the foundation for my survey expertise today.

Q: How do you see your role as a survey expert?

A: When I provide expert opinions about a survey that I have conducted, I see my role as bringing the voice of the consumer into the courtroom. It is my job to conduct a reliable survey that conforms to rigorous scientific standards for survey research, and that adheres to authoritative standards for the relevant type of survey for that matter.

Similarly, when I provide expert rebuttal opinions that criticize an opposing survey, I see my role as an advocate for reliable survey principles. In that capacity, I need to criticize only those aspects of a survey that are truly flawed and make the opposing survey unreliable.

Q: You started a program at MMR called Survey School. What is Survey School, and what motivated you to develop it?

A: We hired marketing research professionals with a combination of academic training in survey research and/or experience conducting professional survey research. However, the field of litigation surveys is very small, so very few staff members have litigation experience before working at IMS. I developed Survey School to provide some classroom-style training in the authoritative standards for litigation surveys. We read some authoritative texts on a particular topic, such as Eveready likelihood of confusion surveys, plus a few survey reports about that topic and court decisions about those surveys. Those case studies help our staff understand the legal concepts at issue, the standards for conducting litigation surveys, and how to apply those standards in our work.

Survey School was so beneficial with new hires that we expanded it to include all of our research staff, helping them stay abreast of current developments in litigation surveys. I believe that treating our work as an academic discipline and keeping current with the latest decisions and authoritative standards is what puts our firm at the top of the field of litigation surveys.

Q: That sounds a lot like teaching. You used to be a marketing professor. Do you miss teaching?

A: When I was a marketing professor, I really enjoyed teaching and even earned some teaching awards. But I find ways to teach even in my role as a survey expert. In addition to Survey School, I have provided some CLEs and other invited talks about litigation surveys to attorneys and law school students. I have also moderated roundtable discussions at several INTA annual meetings.

Furthermore, I find that testifying is similar to teaching. When I am being deposed or testifying in court, I often find myself explaining the academic and authoritative standards for a particular type of survey and how my survey adheres to those standards. Alternatively, I may be explaining how an opposing survey fails to adhere to those survey standards and why it is therefore unreliable. Although I’m no longer in academia, I am still able to find opportunities to teach.


Visit the link below to explore IMS’s litigation survey services and meet our expert team.


Related Industry Insights